The Need for ChainForge-like Tools in Evaluating Generative Web Search Platforms
A provocation.
Posts
Filtered by: choice-in-search
Clear filter ×hallucinationsocial-search-requestPerplexity-AIcomparing-resultsgenerative-searchdissertationprompt engineeringaiextensionsjagged-frontierseries/extended-frontierworking-draftsearch-auditsmicro interactions in searchYou.comspeculative-designGoogle-BardCGTbetter-searchcompetition-in-searchchoice-in-searchgenerative-web-searchknowledge-cutoffsalternative-search-enginesevaluating-results-metasearch-quality-complaintsstanding-queriessearch-engine-optimizationrepository-of-examplesAnthropic-ClaudeCFP-RFPRAGPhinddoubtingadvertising-in-searchseo-for-social-goodOpenAI-ChatGPTsituated-practicepublic-interest-technologyspeculative-classroom-exercisesTavilysearch-user-interfacesgenerative-search-APIfresh-searchautocomplete-in-web-searchfalse-premiseTikTokAndievaluating-search-enginesarticulation+234 more
Showing 5 posts tagged "choice-in-search"
Towards "benchmarking" democratization of good search.
A recommendation.
Who is going to try to make web search better?
What organizations are best situated to apply their own resources and promote developer attention and energy to this problem and opportunity?
"We might be returning to the early/pre-Google era of the 1990s where there were multiple search engines"
tooling to support people in making hands-on and open evaluations of search
We have a big chance to really change search for the better. Will we?