
<div class="card">
<div class="card-body">
<small class="text-muted p-0 m-0">\@danielsgriffin via Twitter on Aug 25, 2019<a href="https://twitter.com/danielsgriffin/status/1165715422059978752"> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor" class="bi bi-link-45deg" viewBox="0 0 16 16">
  <path d="M4.715 6.542 3.343 7.914a3 3 0 1 0 4.243 4.243l1.828-1.829A3 3 0 0 0 8.586 5.5L8 6.086a1.002 1.002 0 0 0-.154.199 2 2 0 0 1 .861 3.337L6.88 11.45a2 2 0 1 1-2.83-2.83l.793-.792a4.018 4.018 0 0 1-.128-1.287z"/>
  <path d="M6.586 4.672A3 3 0 0 0 7.414 9.5l.775-.776a2 2 0 0 1-.896-3.346L9.12 3.55a2 2 0 1 1 2.83 2.83l-.793.792c.112.42.155.855.128 1.287l1.372-1.372a3 3 0 1 0-4.243-4.243L6.586 4.672z"/>
</svg></a></small>
<p class="card-text">
Imagined Postcolonial Emendations in Searching
<br><br>
Q: How might we imagine Google, its cultural searching assumptions, and its "localization" in search suggestions through a postcolonial discourse?
</p>

<!--more-->

<div class="card">
<div class="card-header">I tweeted out the above question, pointing to an earlier thread, in this quoted tweet on a critical incident regarding #NoMeCuidanMeViolan and Google search suggestions.</div>
<div class="card-body">
<small class="text-muted p-0 m-0">\@danielsgriffin via Twitter on Aug 23, 2019<a href="https://twitter.com/danielsgriffin/status/1165064594752065536"> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="16" height="16" fill="currentColor" class="bi bi-link-45deg" viewBox="0 0 16 16">
  <path d="M4.715 6.542 3.343 7.914a3 3 0 1 0 4.243 4.243l1.828-1.829A3 3 0 0 0 8.586 5.5L8 6.086a1.002 1.002 0 0 0-.154.199 2 2 0 0 1 .861 3.337L6.88 11.45a2 2 0 1 1-2.83-2.83l.793-.792a4.018 4.018 0 0 1-.128-1.287z"/>
  <path d="M6.586 4.672A3 3 0 0 0 7.414 9.5l.775-.776a2 2 0 0 1-.896-3.346L9.12 3.55a2 2 0 1 1 2.83 2.83l-.793.792c.112.42.155.855.128 1.287l1.372-1.372a3 3 0 1 0-4.243-4.243L6.586 4.672z"/>
</svg></a></small>
<p class="card-text">Fn11. In addition to forthcoming work 🤞, see: [\@mindyjiang](https://twitter.com/mindyjiang)'s "Search concentration, bias, and parochialism" (2014):
"When searchers are bounded by “the local,” including its political arrangement, cultural content, and ideological outlook,...</p>
<hr>
<p class="card-text">...the diffusion of information, knowledge, and ideas globally through borderless search drifts further away."
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12126">https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12126</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="card-text">"postcolonial discourse – that is, a discourse centered on the questions of power, authority, legitimacy, participation, and intelligibility in the contexts of cultural encounter, particularly in the context of contemporary globalization." - @irani2010postcolonial</p>
<hr>
<p class="card-text">Original: "Defined by Irani et al.’s (2010) framework of postcolonial computing, ‘‘a project of understanding how all design research and practice is culturally located and power laden,’’ we sought to critically examine the cultural assumptions of blocking technologies..."</p>
<li class="small list-group-item bg-light col-6 mx-auto text-center">The above is a quotation from @jonas2019friction.</li>
<hr>
<p class="card-text">Emended: "Defined by Irani et al.’s (2010) framework of postcolonial computing, ‘‘a project of understanding how all design research and practice is culturally located and power laden,’’ we sought to critically examine the cultural assumptions of ["localization"] technologies..."</p>

<div style="display: none;">
- @jonas2019friction
- @irani2010postcolonial
</div>

</div>
<div class="card-footer">Footnotes omitted.
</div>
<div class="card-footer">This page was published on 2019-09-09.

Updated on 2023-07-11: updated tweet display to cards.
</div>
</div>
