Category: curiositys-wager
- Curiosity’s Wager 10: What should we become able to do together?
Daniel S. Griffin
I want to return to Curiosity’s Wager with three points.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 9: Recklessness: what must risk change?
Daniel S. Griffin
Recognizing risk requires us to act differently—and enables us to do so.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 8: Hubris: ordinary confidence, scaled up?
Daniel S. Griffin
Hubris is mistaking what I’m able to attempt for what I adequately understand.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 7: Entitlement: what makes this ours to use?
Daniel S. Griffin
Something being accessible or easy to generate doesn’t settle whether using it is justified.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 6: Projection: whose picture of the work?
Daniel S. Griffin
The representation isn’t the world itself. Watching the work exposed a mismatch in my picture.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 5: Overreliance: what disappears in the handoff?
Daniel S. Griffin
The information can remain while an occasion for knowing disappears.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 4: Deference: am I learning to say yes?
Daniel S. Griffin
More approval prompts do not necessarily mean more judgment.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 3: Credulity: what grounds this belief?
Daniel S. Griffin
Credulity concerns what we accept as true without adequately examining its grounds.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 2: Situating: the arrangement—and our place in it
Daniel S. Griffin
How do we protect curiosity—and help it grow?
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager 1: Can we change what we believe?
Daniel S. Griffin
I want to begin with Blaise Pascal and a wager.
November 2, 2026
- Curiosity’s Wager
Daniel S. Griffin
Building and using AI changes more than what we can accomplish. It changes what we practise, notice, believe, and become able to do together. What are we endeavoring to cultivate?
November 2, 2026