Capability is extended by handoff design.
The core question is not whether a model can generate text. It is which human function moved into the system and what new scaffolding made that move tolerable.
Extended Capability Library / field evidence
Curiosity Builds read as evidence: small transfers of judgment, memory, practice, access, and representation into AI-shaped systems. The point is to make the why work legible: what changed, what broke, and what pattern should compound into better applied AI engineering.
In this vocabulary, a handoff is a practical transfer: the system now carries a bit of judgment, memory, access control, explanation, or representation that a person previously carried informally.
The core question is not whether a model can generate text. It is which human function moved into the system and what new scaffolding made that move tolerable.
Pronunciation, scheduling, tutoring, memorial search, and resume writing need different evidence. A single "AI works" claim is too broad to be meaningful.
Staff confirmation, student approval, visible provenance, opt-in recipe generation, and "about, not as" archive boundaries are not limitations around the product. They are part of the product.
A family lending tool, a baseball game, and a student resume builder all reveal the same applied AI issue: systems encode authority, memory, standards, and disagreement.
Every build below is read as a lesson in the extension around the model. That keeps the claims honest: when evidence is thin, the page says what artifact still needs to be preserved.
Can the user express the real situation before generation?
What does the system know, remember, cite, or exclude?
Who or what decides whether the output is acceptable?
Can a wrong output be traced, corrected, and prevented next time?
Who has to approve, own, or stand behind the result?
These are not polished case studies yet. They are claim-bearing evidence notes, optimized to show what each build teaches and what proof still needs to be saved.

early literacy

speech practice

family inventory

sports judgment

constraint solving

small agriculture planning

creative production

adaptive practice

math reasoning

memory and observation

algebra learning

history learning

student career prep
home inventory and recipes
memorial archive
The strongest claim this corpus supports is not "I built AI apps." It is narrower and more useful: I repeatedly embedded AI into real human workflows, found where naive automation failed, and then treated harnesses, evals, feedback loops, data boundaries, and human ratification as part of the system.